Home / Insights / Case Studies
Insights · Case Studies

PCBs: flux off, ionic test passed, coating-ready

The ultrasonic PCB process — 40 kHz, electronics-safe chemistry, cascade DI rinsing and the IPC verification that makes it a production standard.

6 min readBy Misonics application engineers

Flux residue is not a cosmetic issue: ionic residues absorb moisture, grow dendrites and short circuits weeks after the board shipped. This application study documents the ultrasonic PCB cleaning process — parameters, chemistry and the IPC cleanliness verification that makes it a production standard.

Industry
Electronics manufacturing · repair
Components
PCBs and PCBAs — through-hole and SMT
Contamination
Flux residues · solder balls · handling soils
Machine
Misonics MSX, 40 kHz, fine-power control
Chemistry
Electro — electronics-safe aqueous
Standard
IPC ionic cleanliness < 6 µg/in²

The contamination

Ionic flux residues

The critical one: hygroscopic activator residues create electrolytic paths between conductors — electrochemical migration, dendrite growth, field failure. Removal is a reliability requirement.

Rosin and no-clean residues

Sticky films that trap dust, interfere with conformal coating adhesion and obscure inspection under dense components where nothing sprays clean.

Solder balls and particulate

Loose conductive debris under BGAs and connectors — dislodged and flushed by cavitation, unreachable by any line-of-sight wash.

The process

Process diagram
LOADparts in basketSTAGE 1 · SONIC WASHUltrasonic clean40 kHz · 40–55 °CElectro aqueous chemistrygentle power settingSTAGE 2 · RINSEDI water rinseionic residues carriedoff in cascade rinseSTAGE 3 · FINAL RINSEDI polish rinseto final ioniccleanliness targetSTAGE 4 · DRYWarm air drylow-temperaturethorough dry before testRESULTverified & loggedComponent-safe practice throughout: controlled power density, board racked vertically, no resonant dwell on any single frequency thanks to sweep.
ParameterValue
Frequency40 kHz with sweep — the electronics standard
Temperature40–55 °C
ChemistryElectro electronics-safe aqueous detergent
Cycle5–20 minutes depending on flux type and density
VerificationIonic cleanliness to IPC limit < 6 µg/in² NaCl-equivalent; visual to IPC-A-610
ExclusionsUnsealed relays, some MEMS and open transducers — screened per BOM before cycle

Before and after

BEFORE — flux residue ringing joints under dense SMT (macro photo to be added)
AFTER — same board: residues cleared, ionic test passed

The results

Ionic cleanliness to IPC limits, measured. Boards verified below 6 µg/in² — the number the reliability engineer and the auditor both want.
Under-component cleaning no spray achieves. Cavitation works beneath BGAs, connectors and shields — where the dendrites grow.
Coating-ready surfaces. Conformal coating adheres to a residue-free board; rework from delamination stops.
A screened, repeatable production step. Component exclusions handled per BOM; everything else runs the same documented cycle.

Hardware and chemistry

Misonics MSX bench ultrasonic with fine power control

Misonics MSX range

Bench ultrasonics with the power control and sweep electronics-grade work demands — from repair bench to production cell.

Ask about electronics configurations →
Electro electronics-safe aqueous chemistry, 5 litre

Electro

The electronics-safe aqueous detergent in the Misonics range — flux removal without attacking markings, metallisation or components.

View the product, SDS and TDS →
The reliability argument: a board that fails ionic testing is a warranty claim on a timer. The ultrasonic line turns cleanliness from an inspection lottery into a measured production parameter.

Prove it on your parts

Every case study here started the same way: a box of parts and a documented trial. Send us yours.

Talk to an engineerMore Insights
Keep Reading

Next in the series